![]() |
Designprijs
Rotterdam 10 May– 27 Juli 2003 Museum Boijmans van Beuningen Rotterdam |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41
nominations: 09 Madieke
Fleuren, Knitted China 12 Ineke Hans,
Black Beauties 17 Chris Kabel, 1 totree 18 KesselsKramer (Erik Kessels), Make Trade Fare, corporate campaign 19 Rem D. Koolhaas, Möbius schoen 20 Nel Linssen,
papieren sieraden 22 Maurer
United Architects en TU Eindhoven, MU bowl 28 Maureen Mooren & Daniël van der Velden, Archis 29 Maureen
Mooren & Daniël van der Velden, Room
uitnodigingen 32 Viviane
Sassen, Miu Miu campagne 34 Wieki Somers,
Matrasvaas 36 Stichting
Submarine Media 40 Robert
Winkel Architecten, Smarthouse |
|
Museumshop with Design from Rotterdam, provided by VIVID vormgeving |
| |
The Designprijs
Rotterdam is a prize worth twenty thousand euros which is given to Dutch
design. The prize is awarded bi-annually to the designer of the best
product of the two preceding years. The Designprijs Rotterdam has been awarded annually since 1993. From 1997 on the prize is awarded every two years. This year’s edition marks the Designprijs’ 10th anniversary. www.designprijs.nl |
| Two years ago, the Designprijs Rotterdam last presented a variety of nominees and spotlighted the state of design. At that time, discussions conducted by the nomination committee and jury were fuelled by the notion of context which also served as a guideline for the presentation. Today that notion has lost little of its significance, although new questions are now being asked. Questions that necessitate an ongoing critical look at developments in design and confirm the legitimacy of a competition like the Designprijs Rotterdam. After all, two years ago, with the boom economy, design was on course to a glorious future. With the demise of the ‘new economy’ however, that future seems jeopardised. Society’s demand for norms and values is echoed in design. Indeed the call for social relevance in art and design seem to grow ever louder. What are the consequences of these desires for design? Has not industrial design like no other been able to articulate this desire? Or have the segments of design operating on the market sidelines supplied an answer to this question? Subsequently we ask ourselves, how can these results be assessed within the context of the Designprijs Rotterdam? Which specifically Dutch questions currently play a dominant role? Dutch design has outlived its biggest, international hype and now immediate media success can no longer be taken for granted, a review of the own position seems to be noticeable. Does this have repercussions for the so widely praised conceptual manner of thinking, are there shifts discernable and if so, where? |